BORDER PATROL FALSELY IMPRISONED 9 & 14-YEAR-OLD US CITIZEN SIBLINGS

In 2019, a 9-year-old girl, Julia, and her 14-year-old brother, Oscar were in a car returning to the United States with their mother’s friend. They had to return to San Diego after a brief trip in order to attend school. When they arrived at the border at 7am the traffic was moving very slowly through the customs checkpoint according to an article published by Telemundo. The brother and sister and two two other children got out of the car to walk across the border since it would be hours quicker than if they waited to go through in the car. The adult they were traveling with was ordering an Uber to pick the children up on the US side and bring them to school. Julia and Oscar both had valid US passports with them when they arrived at the border checkpoint. The other two children they were with went through to the US without an issue. Julia and Oscar were taken aside for a secondary inspection where they searched their backpacks and then took Julia to a separate room. The officers question them separately and according to court records, and Julia was questioned in a room alone with an officer who was “known for getting confessions.” They allege that Julia is not his sister but actually his cousin using Julia’s passport. He says that he told the officers that Julia was indeed his sister and not his cousin multiple times. Despite Julia and Oscar both telling the officers they were wrong. The officers continued to interrogate the two minors without a parent present. Eventually the officers threaten to take Oscar to jail for human trafficking and he might be charged with sex trafficking a minor unless he signs a statement which says that Julia is his cousin. They held Oscar until the following day before releasing him but they did not release Julia. Her mother was not allowed to see Julia or speak with her because they said she was not the girl’s mother. Not knowing what to do she contacted Telemundo who contacted CBP and the Mexican Consulate. It was not until almost 48 hours later that the minor was released from custody. According to an article in the Los Angeles Times, “The two children remain distressed following the incident. Oscar’s grades declined and his parents sought therapy for him. Julia, who was also in therapy following her detention, also suffered insomnia and nightmares that have continued for years, [Judge] Curiel wrote in his ruling.” “No employee interviews were conducted. All audio and video evidence was deleted. CBP simply put out a press release blaming the children and swept the rest under the rug, If CBP will try to hide the truth when U.S. citizen children are treated so outrageously, imagine how often misconduct against undocumented children will go on uncorrected. I find that deeply troubling.” Joseph McMullen, Attorney for the Family In 2022 the family brought a lawsuit against CBP for unlawfully detaining the two US citizen children, improperly interrogating them, and intentionally inflicting psychological harm. In a 2024 decision the Judge ruled in their favor and criticized the officers in his ruling for failing to interview family members who could have provided proof of the girl’s identity and not reviewing documents in the girl’s backpack that could have quelled their suspicions. “Common sense and ordinary human experience indicate that it was not reasonable to detain Julia for 34 hours to determine her identity or to detain Oscar for about 14 hours to determine whether he was smuggling or trafficking his sister when multiple means of investigation were available and officers unreasonably failed to pursue them,” Judge Curiel wrote in his decision. The Judge awarded $250,000 to the children’s mother, $175,000 to Oscar and $1.1 million to Julia. The attorney for the family said he appreciated the ruling and thanked the Judge for allowing “the opportunity to examine at trial, the high-level CBP officials who were complicit in this outrageous conduct” according to the Las Angeles Times Article. Unfortunately, this is not an isolated incident. Despite the stats posted by DHS it is not uncommon for US citizens and even US citizen children to be wrongfully detained for extended periods of time by immigration officials. In the same year (2019) an eighteen-year-old US citizen high school student who was born in Texas was jailed for weeks by CBP without being charged according to an article from CNN. He was held in atrocious overcrowded conditions that were so bad that he lost 28 pounds during the 27 days he was detained. There were 70 other men being detained in the same cell with only a single toilet that had no door or wall or privacy of any kind. They were given wipes “every few days” to clean themselves. The teen said that the wipes were useless because they were covered in so much dirt. He said that when told the officers he had the right to call an attorney he was told, “you have no rights.” His attorney said he was given the run around by ICE. After he provided ample proof of the teen’s US citizenship including his full birth certificate, ICE continued to detain him two weeks and initiated removal proceedings against him trying to deport him. The teen did not bring legal action against CBP or ICE and has remained remarkably positive about the experience of being kidnapped by his own government for three weeks. In the interview he did with CNN he said, “It’s made me stronger. I see life differently after seeing how other people have been suffering. It’s made me understand many things like how you can live your life while others are suffering.” “It’s made me stronger. I see life differently after seeing how other people have been suffering. It’s made me understand many things like how you can live your life while others are suffering.”

DHS Announced Extension and Redesignation of Haiti & Yemen for Temporary Protected Status (TPS)

Haiti & Yemen TPS Designation

YEMEN On July 8, 2024, Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro N. Mayorkas announced the extension and redesignation of Yemen for Temporary Protected Status for 18 months, from September 4, 2024, to March 3, 2026, due to country conditions in Yemen that prevent individuals from safely returning. The redesignation of Yemen for TPS allows an estimated 1,700 Yemeni nationals (and individuals having no nationality who last habitually resided in Yemen) who have been continuously residing in the United States since July 2, 2024 to file initial applications for TPS, if they are otherwise eligible.The extension of TPS for Yemen allows approximately 2,300 current beneficiaries to retain TPS through March 3, 2026, if they continue to meet TPS eligibility requirements. This extension and redesignation does not apply for anyone who was not already in the United States on July 2, 2024. Accompanying this announcement is a Special Student Relief notice for F-1 nonimmigrant students whose country of citizenship is Yemen, or individuals having no nationality who last habitually resided in Yemen, so that eligible students may request employment authorization, work an increased number of hours while school is in session, and reduce their course load while continuing to maintain F-1 status through the TPS designation period. HAITI On June 28, 2024, Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro N. Mayorkas announced the extension and redesignation of Haiti for Temporary Protected Status for 18 months, from Aug. 4, 2024, to Feb. 3, 2026, due to extraordinary and temporary conditions in Haiti.  The redesignation of Haiti for TPS allows an estimated 309,000 additional Haitian nationals (or individuals having no nationality who last habitually resided in Haiti) to file initial applications for TPS, if they are otherwise eligible and if they established residence in the United States on or before June 3, 2024, and have continued to reside in the United States since then (“continuous residence”). Eligible individuals who do not have TPS may submit an initial Form I-821, Application for Temporary Protected Status, during the initial registration period that runs from July 1, 2024, through Feb. 3, 2026. Applicants also may apply for TPS-related Employment Authorization Documents and for travel authorization. Applicants can request an EAD by submitting a completed Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, with their Form I-821, or separately later. HOW TO APPLY FOR OR EXTEND TPS Current TPS beneficiaries who wish to extend their status through March 3, 2026, must re-register during the 60-day re-registration period from July 10, 2024, through September 9, 2024, to ensure they keep their TPS and employment authorization. DHS recognizes that not all re-registrants may receive a new Employment Authorization Document before their current EAD expires and is automatically extending through September 3, 2025, the validity of EADs previously issued under Yemen’s TPS designation. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services will continue to process pending applications filed under previous TPS designations for Yemen. Individuals with a pending Form I-821, Application for Temporary Protected Status, or a related Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, as of July 10, 2024 do not need to file either application again. If USCIS approves a pending Form I-821 or Form I-765 filed under the previous designation of TPS for Yemen, USCIS will grant the individual TPS through March 3, 2026, and issue an EAD valid through the same date. Under the redesignation of Yemen, eligible individuals who do not have TPS may submit an initial Form I-821, Application for Temporary Protected Status, during the initial registration period that runs from July 10, 2024 through March 3, 2026. Applicants also may apply for TPS-related EADs and for travel authorization. Applicants can request an EAD by submitting a completed Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, with their Form I-821, or separately later. ANNOUNCEMENTS: Secretary Mayorkas Announces Extension and Redesignation of Yemen for Temporary Protected Status Secretary Mayorkas Announces Extension and Redesignation of Haiti for Temporary Protected Status

EOIR Launches Respondent Access Portal

EOIR Launches Respondent Access Portal

On July 2, 2024, EOIR sent out a Stakeholder Update by email announcing the launch of the Respondent Access Portal. Per the announcement, this will be a phased enrollment which will allow unrepresented respondents to access the Electronic Record of Proceedings for their Immigration Court (EOIR) case. This will make it much easier for unrepresented respondents to keep track of their removal proceedings, stay informed about rescheduled hearing dates, and submit evidence to the Court. EOIR Stakeholder UpdateEOIR today announced it has launched Respondent Access Portal, part of the Access EOIR Initiative. Through a phased enrollment, Respondent Access Portal will allow unrepresented individuals who have cases before EOIR to view their case information, keep informed about hearing schedules, download electronic Records of Proceedings, and file case-related documents. Unrepresented adult noncitizens will receive an official notice from the immigration court. Please see the agency notice for more details. EOIR Stakeholder Update See the agency notice for more details. NOTICE Download MAGA IMPACT OF SECOND TRUMP TERM ON IMMIGRANTS IN THE US What can we expect from a second term from President Trump? How bad would it be for immigrants in the US? Learn More

Biden Administration Expands Parole In Place to Spouse’s of US Citizens–Does NOT Extend Immigration Benefits to Any Immigrants Who Were not Already Eligible for a Green Card

What is Parole-in-Place? Parole-in-Place (PIP) is an immigration policy that grants temporary protected legal status to certain undocumented individuals who are already in the United States that are present without admission or parole. It is a sort of legal fiction in which the person will be “paroled” into the US without actually having to leave and reenter. Once a noncitizen has been paroled into the US they become eligible to adjust status to that of a legal permanent resident, something that cannot be done (in most circumstances) by a noncitizen who entered the US without being admitted or paroled. PIP’s main benefit is not the temporary protection or the temporary employment authorization, rather, it is that it makes a person with an immigrant visa petition from their US citizen spouse eligible to adjust status and become a resident without having to get a waiver or leave the country. Is Parole-in-Place Something New? Traditionally, PIP has been available to undocumented family members of U.S. military personnel. It exists through Section 212(d)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act which provides wide discretion to the Department of Homeland Security to parole someone into the US for humanitarian purposes. President Biden’s new policy expands its scope to include spouses of U.S. citizens. Does This Announcement Make Millions of Immigrants Eligible for Legal Immigration Status? No. It does not make anyone eligible for legal immigration status if they weren’t already eligible. You probably saw many headlines parroting the line from the White House’s Press Release stating “the Biden administration estimates the parole in place program will offer amnesty, and a path to legal permanent residency, to 500,000 spouses of U.S. citizens and 50,000 children under 21.” Those numbers seem greatly exaggerated but more importantly, the entire announcement is very misleading. The extension of parole-in-place for spouses of US citizens that have been in the US for ten years will not “create a path to legal status” for a single person. Every person who is eligible for this parole-in-place already had a path to permanent residency and eventual citizenship. This announcement will not benefit anyone who wasn’t already eligible for a green card. This might shorten the amount of time it takes for them to obtain residency, it will reduce the amount of paperwork they are required to file, and it will eliminate the need for them to depart the country and reenter legally. Since the three and ten year bars on reentry to the US due to unlawful presence were created in 1996 as part of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, there has been “waiver” available for the spouses of US citizens. The Obama administration expanded that waiver to include spouses and children of US citizens and permanent residents (green card holders). So anyone who qualifies for parole-in-place through Biden’s new program would have been eligible to obtain legal residency already. The majority of the people who are eligible in the US probably have a waiver pending or already approved and are waiting for a visa interview. It is incredible how the media churns out AI generated articles and copy-paste news alerts that all simply repeat the information in the press release without mentioning the above. Even the articles criticizing this move fail to address this and claim that this move protects a half a million immigrants from deportation. This announcement comes two weeks after he issued a sweeping executive action that allows US officials to quickly remove migrants entering the US illegally without processing their asylum requests. That resulted in a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) that argues that the policy violates US immigration law. The White House’s claim that this election-year move will protect more than 500,000 people from deportation doesn’t ring true. It saves them from the inconvenience of having to obtain a waiver and attend a consulate interview in their home country. The additional claim that this will benefit “roughly 50,000 noncitizen children of immigrants under the age of 21 whose parent are married to a US citizen” seems to be referencing the minor children who would be considered paroled upon the parole-in-place of their parent, which would allow them to adjust status based on the step-child petition they would likely have from the US citizen spouse of their parent. People are divided along party lines in their support of this executive order and I see people on both sides incorrectly stating that this is some sort of unprecedented move to extend residency to a tremendous number of immigrants that are in the US without status. It’s basically just political theater. People are debating the merits of an announcement that doesn’t actually expand eligibility to legal immigration status. The media should make an attempt to explain this to people rather than reprinting hundreds of identical articles and blog posts spreading misinformation. Who is Eligible for Parole In Place? In order to qualify for parole in place, the spouse of the U.S. Citizen must: Link to the Official Department of Homeland Security Fact Sheet for this topic.

Biden Announces Executive Action Barring Asylum for Migrants Crossing the Southern Border

President Biden has announced new executive actions to address the situation at the southern border. These actions aim to deter unlawful border crossings and manage the high volume of encounters. The key points are: Barring Asylum for Unlawful Crossings: Migrants who cross the southern border unlawfully will be ineligible for asylum, with exceptions for those who use lawful pathways or seek protection in a country they traveled through. Expedited Removal: The administration will streamline processes to remove individuals without a legal basis to remain in the U.S. more quickly. Increased Resources: Additional personnel and resources will be allocated to support border management efforts. These measures will be implemented when the number of encounters exceeds the government’s capacity to process them promptly, as is currently the case. Presumably this means that the rule will take effect immediately. The President emphasized the importance of securing the border while upholding America’s commitment to providing protection for those fleeing persecution. He also expressed disappointment over the failure of Congress to pass comprehensive immigration reform, which would have addressed these issues more effectively. See the White House’s Fact Sheet. There are two measures being taken to further the goal of stemming the influx of migrants at the southern border. Presidential Proclamation: This temporarily suspends the entry of noncitizens across the southern border. Joint DHS-DOJ Interim Final Rule: This restricts asylum eligibility for those who enter the U.S. irregularly across the southern border, including both the southwest land and southern coastal borders. According to the announcement, these actions aim to: Deter irregular migration: By increasing the consequences for unauthorized entry and restricting asylum eligibility, the administration hopes to discourage individuals from attempting to cross the border illegally. Manage the border: The measures are designed to help manage the high number of encounters at the southern border and ensure a more orderly process. Protect national security: The administration emphasizes the importance of border security for protecting the nation. The administration continues to call on Congress to provide additional resources and support for border security efforts. You can find more information about these measures in the official fact sheet. SEE VIDEO OF ANNOUNCEMENT

Temporary Asylum Location Opening in Oakland, California

May 13, 2024, US Citizenship and Immigration Services announced that the San Francisco Asylum Office will be opening a temporary location in Oakland, California. In announcement made on Monday, May 13, 2024:   USCIS’ San Francisco Asylum Office is opening an additional temporary location in Oakland, California. Effective May 15, 2024, asylum applicants under the jurisdiction of the San Francisco Asylum Office may receive an interview notice to appear at the asylum office located in Oakland instead of San Francisco. This additional location increases the San Francisco Asylum Office’s capacity to schedule and conduct affirmative asylum interviews more efficiently. The addresses of the new temporary Oakland-based office within the San Francisco Asylum Office’s jurisdiction are: Physical Address: 1301 Clay StreetOakland, CA 94612 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 77530San Francisco, CA 94107 Opening this additional location will not affect the operations of the current asylum office location in San Francisco. Beginning May 15, 2024, the San Francisco Asylum Office will schedule and conduct affirmative asylum interviews at both locations.