Should You Be Afraid of Denaturalization?

The quick answer is, probably not. Unless you obtained your status through fraud then it is not something you should be concerned about. However, denaturalization is complicated so if you want to understand how it works then you’ll need to read the summary below.

A Brief Guide to the Revocation of Naturalized U.S. Citizenship

  • Denaturalization is the revocation of U.S. citizenship for a naturalized immigrant by the U.S. government.
  • It can only occur by judicial order through civil proceedings or a criminal conviction for naturalization fraud.
  • The main grounds are:
    • 1. willful misrepresentation or concealment of a material fact; and
    • 2. illegal procurement (not being eligible in the first place).
  • There is no statute of limitations for pursuing a civil denaturalization case.
  • An individual whose citizenship is revoked returns to their previous immigration status and may face deportation.
  • The federal government must meet a high burden of proof—”clear, convincing, and unequivocal evidence” for civil cases.

What is Denaturalization?

Denaturalization is the legal process by which the U.S. government revokes the United States citizenship of a naturalized immigrant. This action must occur by a judicial order, which can be issued through civil proceedings or as a result of a criminal conviction for naturalization fraud.

When the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) finds “sufficient evidence,” it refers cases for civil or criminal denaturalization to the Department of Justice (DOJ). The DOJ’s U.S. Attorney’s Office then files the necessary legal action in Federal District Court. An individual whose citizenship is revoked reverts to the immigration status they held before becoming a U.S. citizen and may face deportation if they lack lawful status.

Grounds for Denaturalization

The federal government generally pursues denaturalization under two main grounds:

  1. Procurement by Concealment or Willful Misrepresentation:
    • This applies if an individual deliberately deceived the government by failing to disclose or actively misrepresenting a material fact that influenced the decision to award them citizenship.
    • To be denaturalized on this basis, the government must show the misrepresentation/concealment was willful, material, and that the individual procured citizenship as a result of it.
    • Affiliation with a totalitarian party, the Communist Party, or a terrorist organization within a specific timeframe (ten years before or five years after naturalization) also falls under this category, as it indicates a lack of attachment to the U.S. Constitution.
  2. Illegal Procurement of Naturalization:
    • This applies if the individual was not eligible for naturalization because they failed to meet all statutory requirements, such as those related to lawful admission, physical presence, residence, or good moral character.
    • In this scenario, citizenship can be revoked even if the individual did not engage in willful deception. For example, a court revoked the citizenship of an individual who had committed human smuggling prior to naturalization, a factor that should have barred him from obtaining citizenship due to poor moral character.

Limitations and Burden of Proof

The federal government faces a high burden of proof in these cases:

  • Civil Denaturalization: The government must show “clear, convincing, and unequivocal evidence which does not leave the issue in doubt”. There is no statute of limitations for these cases.
  • Criminal Denaturalization: The government must show “proof beyond a reasonable doubt” that the individual knowingly obtained citizenship through fraud. These cases are subject to a ten-year statute of limitation.

The Supreme Court has narrowed the scope for criminal denaturalization, ruling that an illegal act must have played a role in the individual acquiring U.S. citizenship. “Small omissions and minor lies” that did not influence the award of citizenship are not sufficient grounds for denaturalization.

Impact on Family

A spouse or child who became a U.S. citizen through the naturalization of a parent or spouse may lose their U.S. citizenship if the parent/spouse’s citizenship is revoked based on concealment of a material fact or willful misrepresentation.

However, family members do not lose their U.S. citizenship if the parent or spouse’s citizenship is revoked due to the illegal procurement of naturalization.

Recent Trends in Denaturalization Efforts

The number of denaturalization cases filed by the DOJ has increased in the last decade.

The DOJ’s Civil Division has recently directed attorneys to prioritize denaturalization cases as one of its top enforcement priorities, expanding the categories of focus beyond the historical concentration on war criminals and terrorist funders. These priority categories now include naturalized citizens who have:

  • Posed a potential danger to national security (terrorism, espionage).
  • Engaged in human rights violations, torture, or war crimes.
  • Committed felonies that were not disclosed during naturalization.
  • Engaged in financial fraud against the United States (PPP, Medicaid/Medicare).

Some experts are concerned that broad denaturalization efforts could lead to the revocation of citizenship for individuals who made minor or unintentional errors or omissions on their naturalization application, especially given that there is no statute of limitations for civil denaturalization and certain application questions can be broad or vague.


💥 Consequences of Denaturalization

The consequences of denaturalization are severe and wide-ranging.

For the Individual Whose Citizenship is Revoked:

  • Loss of Citizenship and Immigration Status: The individual loses their U.S. citizenship. They return to the immigration status they held before becoming a U.S. citizen. In many cases, this status is that of a Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR).
  • Risk of Deportation (Removal): Once denaturalized, the individual becomes subject to the laws governing non-citizens. The conduct used to revoke citizenship (e.g., criminal activity, fraud) is often an independent and sufficient ground for the government to initiate deportation (removal) proceedings before an immigration judge.
  • Surrender of Documents: The court enters an order canceling the Certificate of Naturalization, and the individual must surrender this certificate.
  • Loss of Rights: The individual loses fundamental rights and privileges associated with citizenship, such as the right to vote, work, receive certain benefits, and travel with a U.S. passport.
  • Potential Jail Time: If the citizenship was revoked because of a criminal conviction, the individual may also serve jail time.
  • Option to Renounce: An individual can choose to voluntarily renounce their U.S. citizenship rather than contest the court proceedings.

For Family Members:

Family members who obtained their own U.S. citizenship through the naturalization of the revoked individual may also lose their citizenship, depending on the grounds for denaturalization.

Basis for Parent/Spouse’s RevocationImpact on Naturalized Spouse or Child
Procurement by concealment of a material fact or willful misrepresentationCitizenship is lost, regardless of whether the spouse or child lives inside or outside the U.S..
Illegal procurement of naturalizationCitizenship is not lost.
Affiliation with a totalitarian/terrorist organization or other than honorable military separationCitizenship is lost only if the spouse or child resides outside the U.S. at the time of revocation.

USCIS Implements “a Rigorous, Holistic, and Comprehensive Good Moral Character Standard” for Naturalization

On August 15, 2025, the Department of Homeland Security published PM-602-0188, a Policy Memorandum with the subject, “Restoring a Rigorous, Holistic, and Comprehensive Good Moral Character
Evaluation Standard for Aliens Applying for Naturalization
.”

KEY POINTS

  • The evaluation of good moral character for naturalization applicants will now be a “holistic assessment” of a person’s behavior and adherence to societal norms.
  • The assessment will not only check for an absence of disqualifying acts and negative factors but applicants will be required to show a “genuine positive assessment of character.”
  • USCIS officers should consider how the applicant has lived in their community and whether they made positive contributions.
  • USCIS officers are now explicitly directed to weigh all relevant evidence, both adverse and favorable, before making a decision.
  • The standard of proof for all naturalization requirements, including GMC, remains a preponderance of the evidence, meaning an applicant must show it is “more likely than not” that they have met all requirements.

The policy memorandum from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) outlines a new more “comprehensive and holistic standard” for evaluating an applicant’s “good moral character” (GMC) for naturalization. Key points of the new policy include a new assessment of a person’s behavior looking for adherence to societal norms, and positive contributions, looking for more than just the absence of disqualifying acts and requiring a “genuine positive assessment of character”, USCIS officers are now explicitly directed to weight all evidence to determine if GMC is established by a preponderance of the evidence.

Changes and Potential Impacts on Applicants

  • Holistic Evaluation: This policy signals a shift from a firm, checklist-based approach to a “totality of circumstances” approach. Before the 1990s, the evaluation was broader, and USCIS is now returning to that framework.
  • Greater Emphasis on Positive Contributions: USCIS will place greater emphasis on an applicant’s positive attributes and contributions, such as sustained community involvement, family caregiving, educational attainment, a stable and lawful employment history, length of lawful residence, and compliance with financial obligations.
  • Increased Scrutiny of Negative Behavior: While permanent bars like murder or aggravated felonies remain unconditional and permanent, USCIS will also focus greater attention on other potentially disqualifying behaviors. This includes conditional bars (e.g., DUI convictions, unlawful voting) and other acts that are “contrary to the average behavior of citizens” even if technically lawful, such as reckless traffic infractions or aggressive solicitation.
  • Focus on Rehabilitation: The policy emphasizes that evidence of genuine rehabilitation for past wrongdoing may support a finding of GMC.

How Does This Change the Application Process

  • Affirmatively Demonstrate Positive Character
    Applicants should not rely solely on the absence of disqualifying acts. They must actively present their full story, showing how their life aligns with the ethical standards of their community and affirmatively demonstrate their positive character.
  • Provide Evidence of Positive Attributes
    Applicants must provide, wit their N-400 Application, evidence of their positive attributes and contributions. This could include documentation of community involvement, educational achievements, stable employment, and a history of financial responsibility.
  • Address Past Issues with Evidence of Rehabilitation or Consider Waiting to Apply
    If an applicant has a history of wrongdoing that does not bar them and they wish to apply they must first speak with an immigration attorney to assess the risk and if they proceed then they should provide evidence of rehabilitation. Examples of such evidence include proof of rectifying overdue child support or taxes, complying with probation, and obtaining community testimony from credible sources.

    Any applicant with a criminal record, even if it does not disqualify them from naturalizing, should strongly consider waiting util Trump is no longer in office to apply for naturalization.
  • Be Prepared for Detailed Questions
    USCIS officers will review all available documentation and may question applicants about the specific circumstances of their past actions to determine if they should be barred from naturalization. Applicants should be prepared to explain any past issues and demonstrate how they have reformed. You should speak with an attorney to get prepped for your interview even if you are going to attend the interview by yourself unrepresented.

Read the full Policy Memorandum from the USCIS website.

Learn more about Naturalization and the Good Moral Character requirement for US citizenship. Learn how to Prepare for the Civics Examination for Naturalization.

If you would like to consult an immigration attorney about the naturalization process you can schedule a virtual consultation.

Naturalization Test Redesign

Naturalization Test Redesign

Friday, April 28, 2023 | 2-3 p.m. Eastern

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is holding a “national engagement” on Friday, April 28, 2023, from 2 – 3 p.m. Eastern, to allow people to, “learn more about the nationwide trial tests for the naturalization test redesign initiative.” This is according to an email sent out by USCIS on April 11, 2023. 


People can sign up to virtually attend this event using the registration page.

Additional Information in the Email Below.

During this engagement, USCIS will provide updates on the naturalization test redesign initiative and address questions. 

Once we process your registration, you will receive a confirmation email with the participation link. If you have any questions, or if you have not received a confirmation email within three business days, please email us at public.engagement@uscis.dhs.gov.

Submit Questions in Advance:

We encourage you to submit questions for the engagement in advance by emailing natzredesign22@uscis.dhs.gov by 4 p.m. Eastern on Thursday, April 20.

We also invite you to submit comments on the trial testing. Put “Naturalization Test Redesign” in the subject line.

We will not address case-specific questions, or issues under active litigation or likely to be litigated, or take comments outside the scope of the engagement.

To request a disability accommodation to participate in this engagement, email us at public.engagement@uscis.dhs.gov by 4 p.m. Eastern on Friday, April 21

Note to media:

This webinar is not for press purposes. Please contact the USCIS Press Office at media@uscis.dhs.gov for any media inquiries.